Future work – Campylobacter – Joint Working Group https://campylobacter.org.uk Food safety joint working group specifically focused on the reduction of the Campylobacter bacteria on chickens. Mon, 01 Dec 2014 16:13:20 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.0.17 The Problems of Biofilm https://campylobacter.org.uk/the-problems-of-biofilm/ Mon, 01 Dec 2014 16:13:20 +0000 https://campylobacter.mystagingwebsite.com/?p=557 A study by the Institute of Food Research has looked at at how campylobacter in the ‘juice’ from chickens can create a biofilm on kitchen surfaces. This research, led by Helen Brown at IFR, has also been reported in the Daily Mail. The study highlights the important role that good kitchen hygiene practice has in…

]]>
A study by the Institute of Food Research has looked at at how campylobacter in the ‘juice’ from chickens can create a biofilm on kitchen surfaces. This research, led by Helen Brown at IFR, has also been reported in the Daily Mail.

The study highlights the important role that good kitchen hygiene practice has in preventing infection through cross contamination, and the need to clean surfaces and utensils thoroughly.

But the problem of biofilms extends beyond the kitchen, and is in fact an issue at many points in the production chain. It is one of the reasons why campylobacter is proving such a tricky customer.

One such area of focus for the poultry industry is crates and modules. These are pieces of equipment used in the catching process. Modules create a drawer-like structure into which multiple crates are placed. This kit shuttles between farms and the slaughterhouse and is a potential route of how campylobacter gets onto sites.

Getting equipment such as this visually clean is a minimum standard applied across the industry, but it has been found that campylobacter can survive in a biofilm similar to that described in the IFR paper. So what does that mean for crates and modules?

Traditional design of this equipment has meant that new ideas are needed in both their use and their cleaning. In their use we’re seeing new practices that minimise the time that crates and modules spend in and around chicken houses, but this is always going to be compromised by the amount of faecal matter chickens produce during catching and transport.

So cleaning of crates and modules becomes even more important. Work is underway on novel washing systems that disrupt the biofilm as well as removing the visible dirt. Trials are also ongoing on using higher temperatures in the water used for cleaning. Previously the plastic of the crates warped or became brittle if the temperature exceeded a certain value.

Ultimately this part of the effort against campylobacter is going to require a combination of novel design, new cleaning techniques, and good practice in use.

What we’re interested in is whether work from other areas can contribute to our understanding in this specific one. If you think you can help please get in touch.

]]>
A Guide to Interventions https://campylobacter.org.uk/a-guide-to-interventions/ Wed, 05 Nov 2014 16:26:03 +0000 https://campylobacter.mystagingwebsite.com/?p=484 Interventions are the actions taken at specific points in the production chain that have the best potential to either block or reduce the presence of campylobacter. They are science-based and the result of the many projects undertaken since 2009. Our key intervention points are: On farm biosecurity Catching practices Thinning practices Crates and modules Scalding…

]]>
Interventions are the actions taken at specific points in the production chain that have the best potential to either block or reduce the presence of campylobacter.

They are science-based and the result of the many projects undertaken since 2009.

Our key intervention points are:

  • On farm biosecurity
  • Catching practices
  • Thinning practices
  • Crates and modules
  • Scalding practices
  • Washing practices
  • Heat treatments
  • Cold treatments
  • Novel packaging

This list represents those areas where research is suggesting the largest impact in the shortest time. Other intervention points, such as evisceration practices and kitchen hygiene awareness are still be examined.

On farm biosecurity

Biosecurity is the term used to describe the actions taken to prevent campylobacter entering flocks from the natural environment.

Good husbandry requires farmers to enter the houses a number of times every day to assess the health and welfare of birds, so consistent application of disinfectant foot dips, changing boots and clothing, and physical barriers to stop dirt entering from outside are important elements.

Red Tractor standards now have enhanced biosecurity requirement focused on campylobacter. This includes the human interaction with the flocks and also standards of cleanliness for all areas of the farm. Raising awareness of biosecurity, delivering appropriate training, and supporting consistent application are key areas of work for all chicken producing companies.

Research on model farms suggests that near perfect conditions and consistent application of working practices may give us a 10% reduction in the number of flocks infected by campylobacter. This has to be put in the context of farms being exposed to the environment and changing weather conditions, and the variability of working with livestock.

Catching practices

It is essential that catching teams operate to the same standards of biosecurity as farm workers, and Red Tractor standards have been updated to reflect this.

Clothing and equipment entering has to be clean and used in the correct manner. Focus has been on improving awareness and training of catchers, and this work is continuing.

Thinning practices

Thinning is where a proportion of a flock is removed prior (3 to 4 days) to depopulation. This is used to provide birds of different sizes to the retail market.

Work is focusing on limiting the effects of thinning on the remaining birds. For example, reducing the potential for contamination in the catching process, and minimising stress in the rest of the flock that can exacerbate campylobacter colonisation.

Crates and modules

As the equipment used to transport birds from farm to slaughterhouse the crates and modules have a high potential for exposure to campylobacter, and also to move it from site to site.

Traditional techniques that achieve visual cleanliness may leave campylobacter behind in a microbiological film, so work is on-going to enhance cleaning techniques, such as increased use of heat or improved application of disinfectant. Crates impregnated with silver (which has disinfectant properties) are also being trialled.

Practical methodologies for the handling and use of crates and modules are also being explored.

Scalding practices

In the slaughterhouse scalding tanks are vats of hot water through which the bird carcase is passed before de-feathering.

This equipment often sees a build-up of foam on the surface of the water that can increase the risk of cross-contamination between birds. Work is being conducted to look at improving the efficiency of scalding, such as through the use of secondary or multi-stage equipment.

Washing practices

Research has shown that carcase washing equipment operating at a consistently high efficiency can reduce the amount of campylobacter on a carcase by up to 10%. Producers are working on systems designed to maintain high efficiency.

Heat treatments

Campylobacter is sensitive to heat and cold and so interventions in these areas are being researched. Both heat and cold interventions must be balanced with the need to maintain the appearance of the bird that is acceptable to the consumer.

Chill treatments

Novel packaging

Many retailers are now introducing roast-in-the-bag whole chickens into their stores. By removing the need to handle the bird the intention is to reduce incidences of cross-contamination, and help consumers have good kitchen hygiene practices. The bag with the chicken inside is placed in the oven with the bag being cut open a short time before the end of cooking to allow the bird to brown.

]]>